Today is the feast day of Blessed John Duns Scotus, a Franciscan friar from Scotland noted for his theological and philosophical work in the high-Middle Ages (late 13th and early 14th centuries). Scotus’ work was in the generation that followed Thomas of Aquinas and Bonaventure. His work was complex and nuanced, and he is generally considered to be one of the three most important philosopher-theologians of his time. He was given the medieval accolade Doctor Subtilis (Subtle Doctor) for his penetrating and subtle manner of thought.
Perhaps the most influential point of John Duns Scotus’ theology was his defense of the Immaculate Conception of Mary. At the time, there was a great deal of argument about the subject. The general opinion was that it was appropriately deferential to the Mother of God, but it could not be seen how to resolve the problem that only with Christ’s death would the stain of original sin be removed. Notable theologians such as St. Thomas Aquinas opposed the idea of the Immaculate Conception, on the ground that unless the Blessed Virgin had at one time or other been one of the sinful, she could not justly be said to have been redeemed by Christ.
John Duns Scotus proposed a solution to the theological problem of reconciling the doctrine with that of universal redemption in Christ, when he argued that Mary’s immaculate conception did not remove her from redemption by Christ; rather it was the result of a more perfect redemption granted her because of her special role in salvation history. At the end Scotus cites Anselm of Canterbury’s principle, “potuit, decuit, ergo fecit” (God could do it, it was appropriate, therefore he did it).
Scotus’ argument appears in Pope Pius IX’s 1854 declaration of the dogma of the Immaculate Conception, with Scotus’ position hailed as “a correct expression of the faith of the Apostles.”
Another of Scotus’ positions also gained official approval of the Roman Catholic Church. His doctrine on the universal primacy of Christ became the underlying rationale for the feast of Christ the King instituted in 1925. But Scotus’ doctrine on the universal primacy of Christ also became the basis on reconsidering the reason for the Incarnation.
Of all the great theologians before him, none had really considered this Scripture when pondering the reason for the Incarnation.”
He is the image of the invisible God, the firstborn of all creation. For in him were created all things in heaven and on earth, the visible and the invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or powers; all things were created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together. He is the head of the body, the church. He is the beginning, the firstborn from the dead, that in all things he himself might be preeminent. For in him all the fullness was pleased to dwell. (Colossians 1:15-19)
What Scotus saw in these verses was that apart from humanity’s sin and sinfulness, the very intention of creation itself was what determined the presence of Jesus among us. The medieval axiom was that what was first in action was first in intention. Since creation preceded sin, the intention of the Incarnation was to be found in God’s creating the world.
In short, while affirming that Christ died for our sins and without His atonement humanity’s salvation would not be possible, Scotus held the subtle position that dying for our sins was more of a “what” than a “why.” A simple explanation would be the answer to this question: “If Adam and Eve had not sinned, would there have been an Incarnation?” Scotus’ answer is “yes,” Jesus would have come anyway – such is the nature of God’s love and the primacy of Christ. That is the short answer. As you might expect, the long answer is a bit subtle.